Synthetic Phonics

  Synthetic Phonics for teachers and parents

Synthetic Phonics website
Main Page
What are Phonics?
Whole Word method
Phonics Activities

    • Teaching Methods
    • Software
    • Discussion Forum
    • Letters

Books
Hints and Tips
Newsletter
FAQS

    • Research
    • Organizations
    • News
    • Site Map


Dyslexia Certificate

Dyslexia Test

Individual Dyslexia Program

Dyslexia Parents Resource

Dyslexia Online Magazine

Classroom Assistant, Teacher's Aide, Teaching Assistant, Learning Support Assistant



Copyright.

Material in our website is copyright. However, all articles, listings and other material from this website may be printed out and copied for personal or professional use (meetings, courses, etc.) provided that our web address:

www.synthetic-phonics.com

is clearly included in the copy.


www.synthetic-phonics.com

Fast progress in
reading and spelling

DIRECT LEARNING LIMITED

Editor: John Bradford

 

CLACKMANNAN PROGRAM
RESEARCH

f-r-o-g

In 1998, Joyce Watson and Rhona Johnston reported on a study of three hundred Primary 1 children (ages 4/5) in Clackmannanshire, Scotland, in which they examined the effectiveness of a synthetic phonics teaching program compared with a traditional analytic phonics programme.

At the end of the 16 weeks, the reading and spelling of the children on the synthetic phonics programme were around seven months above both their chronological age and the children on the traditional analytic phonics programme.

In thieir report they describe the progress of the children from Primary 1 through to the end of Primary 5 (ages 8/9), to see whether these gains are maintained in the following years and to compare the achievements of boys and girls.

The researchers found the beneficial effects of the synthetic phonics program to be long lasting: for word reading, the gains increased from a seven-month advantage in Primary 1 to a 26-month advantage in Primary 5.

The likely reason for this, they say, is that in learning to recognize and blend sounds early on, children are given a procedure that they can apply for themselves whenever they meet an unknown word.

An unexpected result on the synthetic programme was that in word reading in Primary 3, boys were eight months ahead of girls. In the following two years, the girls were seven months ahead.

Spelling and reading comprehension did not differ significantly between boys and girls, although both were well above their chronological age. In reading comprehension, boys on the synthetic phonics program were also almost ten months ahead of boys on the traditional analytic programme.

The children are being followed through Primary 6 and 7 to determine whether boys keep their advantage to the end of primary school.

The researchers acknowledge that although the methods used in their study gave long-lasting benefits for boys, it is not clear whether all synthetic phonics programs will be so effective.

With thanks to the Scottish Executive Education Department.

 

 Back to top